Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:3969897rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0000768lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3969897lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0027051lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3969897lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0014124lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3969897lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0021308lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3969897lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205400lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3969897lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0312418lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3969897lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0449864lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3969897lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1511790lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3969897lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0026597lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3969897lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0039155lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3969897lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0456389lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3969897lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0036667lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3969897lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0677535lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:issue5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:dateCreated1985-3-18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:abstractTextThis study evaluated the ability of 2-dimensional echocardiography to detect myocardial infarcts of varying sizes. Echocardiography was performed in 29 closed-chest, conscious dogs 2 days after circumflex coronary artery occlusion, and the ultrasonic recordings were analyzed for regional abnormalities in either wall thickening or endocardial motion. Acute myocardial infarct (AMI) size and extent were assessed by morphologic examination. In 5 dogs, coronary occlusion failed to produce AMI; in these dogs wall thickening analysis showed no abnormalities (100% specificity), and endocardial motion analysis yielded 1 false-positive result (80% specificity). In 24 dogs an AMI developed; infarcts larger than 18% of left ventricular mass uniformly resulted in echocardiographically detectable contraction abnormalities. When the AMI was small (1 to 6% of left ventricular mass) and primarily subendocardial, the sensitivity of echocardiography was poor: Only 3 of 10 of the dogs with a small AMI had abnormalities by wall thickening, and only 1 of 10 by endocardial motion. Thus, in this canine model of AMI, 2-dimensional echocardiography was insensitive to small, subendocardial AMI. If this is so in humans as well, it is a potential limitation of the clinical use of echocardiography in the detection of AMI.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:monthFeblld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:issn0002-9149lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MarcusM LMLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KoyanagiSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KerberR ERElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CollinsS MSMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SkortonD JDJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PandianN GNGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KiesoRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:day15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:volume55lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:pagination551-5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3969897-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3969897-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3969897-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3969897-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3969897-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3969897-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3969897-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3969897-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3969897-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:year1985lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:articleTitleMyocardial infarct size threshold for two-dimensional echocardiographic detection: sensitivity of systolic wall thickening and endocardial motion abnormalities in small versus large infarcts.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3969897pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:3969897lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:3969897lld:pubmed