Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:3808317rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0242726lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3808317lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205064lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3808317lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0700594lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3808317lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0011900lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3808317lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1948023lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:dateCreated1987-3-10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:abstractTextCervical root stimulation (CRS) was compared with conventional EMG, nerve conduction, and late response studies in 34 patients with possible cervical radiculopathy. Cervical roots were stimulated by monopolar needles inserted into paraspinal muscles, recording compound muscle action potentials in biceps, triceps, and abductor digiti minimi muscles. In 18 patients with clinical evidence of radiculopathy, EMG was abnormal in 11 (61%), but CRS was abnormal in all 18. Of 16 patients with symptoms but no signs of radiculopathy, EMG was abnormal in 5 (31%) and CRS was abnormal in 9 (56%).lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:monthFeblld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:issn0028-3878lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ShahaniB TBTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WierzbickaMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BusisN ANAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BergerA RARlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LogigianE LELlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:volume37lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:pagination329-32lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3808317-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3808317-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3808317-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3808317-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3808317-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3808317-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3808317-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3808317-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3808317-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3808317-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:year1987lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:articleTitleCervical root stimulation in the diagnosis of radiculopathy.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3808317pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed