Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:3532804rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3532804lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0015811lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3532804lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0521457lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3532804lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0242485lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3532804lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0152150lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3532804lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1444754lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3532804lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1313913lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3532804lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0220934lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3532804pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3532804pubmed:dateCreated1986-11-19lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3532804pubmed:abstractTextThe fetal femoral length and biparietal diameter were measured by ultrasound on 1657 occasions in 1289 singleton pregnancies between 12 and 41 weeks' gestation. Mean values for fetal femoral length were significantly lower than those demonstrated in previous studies, with the difference becoming greater approaching term. Three hundred twenty-two measurements of fetal femoral length were made on 57 patients with twin pregnancies, with no significant difference noted between the means of these recordings and the means of the singleton pregnancies.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3532804pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3532804pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3532804pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3532804pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3532804pubmed:monthOctlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3532804pubmed:issn0002-9378lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3532804pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JonesW RWRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3532804pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LangloisS LSLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3532804pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HainesC JCJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3532804pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3532804pubmed:volume155lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3532804pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3532804pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3532804pubmed:pagination838-41lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3532804pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3532804pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3532804-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3532804pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3532804-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3532804pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3532804-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3532804pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3532804-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3532804pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3532804-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3532804pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3532804-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3532804pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3532804-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3532804pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3532804-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3532804pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3532804-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3532804pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3532804-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3532804pubmed:year1986lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3532804pubmed:articleTitleUltrasonic measurement of fetal femoral length in singleton and twin pregnancies.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3532804pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3532804pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:3532804lld:pubmed