Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2932043rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030350lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2932043lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0033095lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2932043lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0039593lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2932043lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0242485lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2932043lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0443131lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:issue9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:dateCreated1985-11-21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:abstractTextIntra-arterial pressure measurements have been made in a group of vascular patients using two different methods. The pull-through method, without systemic pressure monitoring, is compared with a technique employing simultaneous radial and femoral arterial puncture. In both techniques, pressures are measured at resting flow and during papaverine induced hyperaemia.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:monthSeplld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:issn0003-3197lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JamesD CDClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:authorpubmed-author:EvansD HDHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BellP RPRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TaylorJ DJDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BakerA RARlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:volume36lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:pagination638-45lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2932043-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2932043-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2932043-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2932043-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2932043-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2932043-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2932043-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2932043-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2932043-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:year1985lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:articleTitleThe accuracy of "pull-through" pressure measurements and papaverine testing.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2932043pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed