Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2898467rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034650lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2898467lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0018496lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2898467lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0036622lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2898467lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0230638lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2898467lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0022885lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2898467lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0392366lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2898467lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0220839lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2898467lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707723lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2898467lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1512571lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:dateCreated1988-8-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:abstractTextThree series of experiments were devised to test the hypothesis that glutamate is the transmitter released by sensory hair cells of the frog semicircular canal. These three tests were: 1 - The Tolerance experiment (i.e. making the preparation tolerant to injected Glu yet still capable of responding to endogenous transmitter). 2 - The Glu Decarboxylase experiment (i.e. bathing the preparation in sufficient enzyme to prevent the effects of exogenous Glu by degrading it without affecting the response to endogenous transmitter) and; 3 - The Diltiazem experiment (i.e. using the calcium channel antagonist, diltiazem, to prevent the effect of exogenous Glu and yet not to interfere with endogenous transmitter release and action). The Tolerance and Diltiazem experiments produced results indicative of a clear dissociation between exogenous Glu and natural transmitter. The Glu decarboxylase experiment results were not so clear, producing both evidence for and against the hypothesis.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:monthJunlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:issn0378-5955lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GuthP SPSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NorrisC HCHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BarronS ESElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:volume33lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:pagination223-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2898467-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2898467-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2898467-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2898467-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2898467-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2898467-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2898467-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2898467-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2898467-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:year1988lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:articleTitleThree tests of the hypothesis that glutamate is the sensory hair cell transmitter in the frog semicircular canal.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Pharmacology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2898467pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed