Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2742341rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2742341lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0015780lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2742341lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0087111lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2742341lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0011900lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2742341lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0238502lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2742341lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0868928lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2742341pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2742341pubmed:dateCreated1989-8-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2742341pubmed:abstractTextThe authors present 10 cases of urethrocele, 5 of which were diagnosed after a delay of 1 to 12 years after onset of the initial signs. A single case of endoscopic treatment: opening of the neck in an elderly patient in poor general condition; 9 excisions of the urethrocele pouch with a single transient urethro-vaginal fistula which closed spontaneously. There were no cases of postoperative incontinence. Installation of the patient in the ventral decubitus position with the thighs semi-flexed in abduction provides much greater operative comfort to the classical gynaecological position. The use of an L-shaped vaginal incision, not in the line of the urethra, limits the risks of secondary fistula.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2742341pubmed:languagefrelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2742341pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2742341pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2742341pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2742341pubmed:issn0003-4401lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2742341pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SachotJ LJLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2742341pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RatajczakAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2742341pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2742341pubmed:volume23lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2742341pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2742341pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2742341pubmed:pagination156-7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2742341pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2742341pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2742341-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2742341pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2742341-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2742341pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2742341-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2742341pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2742341-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2742341pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2742341-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2742341pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2742341-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2742341pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2742341-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2742341pubmed:year1989lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2742341pubmed:articleTitle[Female urethrocele. Difficult diagnosis and therapy. Apropos of 10 cases].lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2742341pubmed:affiliationChirurgie Urologique, Clinique La Sagesse, Rennes.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2742341pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2742341pubmed:publicationTypeEnglish Abstractlld:pubmed