Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2599614rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2599614lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0021289lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2599614lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0370215lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2599614lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0020023lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2599614lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0936012lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2599614pubmed:issue5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2599614pubmed:dateCreated1990-2-1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2599614pubmed:abstractTextAll blood culture reports obtained from newborns admitted in a neonatal care unit during 1983-87 were reviewed to determine the current bacteriological profile of neonatal septicemia. A total of 1160 neonates of high risk category or having clinical features suggestive of septicemia were subjected to blood culture study during this period. The culture positivity rate was 73%. Of these, 24.9% cultures were polymicrobial. Among the 1059, growths obtained, 60.1% were Gram negative, with Klebsiella, E. coli and Pseudomonas as the commonest pathogens. In Gram positive group, coagulase negative Staphylococci were most frequent, constituting 24% of the total isolates. An increasing incidence of coagulase positive Staphylococci and Pseudomonas infections was observed in recent years. Another significant finding was a comparatively high prevalence of Group D beta hemolytic isolates among streptococcal growths, with S. fecalis as the single commonest streptococci isolate.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2599614pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2599614pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2599614pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2599614pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2599614pubmed:monthMaylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2599614pubmed:issn0019-6061lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2599614pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChaturvediPPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2599614pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NarangPPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2599614pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AgrawalMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2599614pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2599614pubmed:volume26lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2599614pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2599614pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2599614pubmed:pagination460-5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2599614pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2599614pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2599614-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2599614pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2599614-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2599614pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2599614-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2599614pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2599614-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2599614pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2599614-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2599614pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2599614-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2599614pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2599614-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2599614pubmed:year1989lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2599614pubmed:articleTitleAnalysis of blood-culture isolates from neonates of a rural hospital.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2599614pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed