pubmed-article:2349988 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0030705 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:2349988 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0009402 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:2349988 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1522577 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:issue | 6 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:dateCreated | 1990-7-6 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:abstractText | In order to evaluate the effectiveness of follow-up in detecting potentially curable recurrences after radical surgery for colorectal cancer, we compared the results in 368 patients undergoing regular follow-up with those in 139 patients outside the follow-up program. The cancer-related 5-year survival rate was 72% in the follow-up group and 62% in the non-follow-up group (difference not significant). Cancer recurrences were more common in the follow-up group than in the group that was not followed (32% versus 21%; p less than 0.02). Curative reoperations were performed in 21% and 7%, respectively (p less than 0.01) of patients with recurrent cancer in these two groups. The cancer-related 5-year survival rate after curative reoperations was 47%. Despite these differences, only the initial Dukes' classification had an independent influence on the survival rate. It is concluded that regular follow-up detects more recurrent cancers, enabling radical reoperations significantly more often than when there is no follow-up. The outcome after curative reoperations is encouraging. These aspects favor regular follow-up of patients with colorectal carcinoma after curative operations. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:citationSubset | AIM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:month | Jun | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:issn | 0002-9610 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:JärvinenHH | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:OvaskaJJ | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:MecklinJ PJP | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:KujariHH | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:PerttiläII | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:volume | 159 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:pagination | 593-6 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2006-11-15 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2349988-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2349988-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2349988-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2349988-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2349988-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2349988-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2349988-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2349988-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2349988-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2349988-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2349988-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2349988-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2349988-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:year | 1990 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:articleTitle | Follow-up of patients operated on for colorectal carcinoma. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:affiliation | Second Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2349988 | pubmed:publicationType | Comparative Study | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:2349988 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:2349988 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:2349988 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:2349988 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:2349988 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:2349988 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:2349988 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:2349988 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:2349988 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:2349988 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:2349988 | lld:pubmed |