Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2269219rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2269219lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1579762lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2269219lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0009491lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2269219lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0026348lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2269219lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0023981lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2269219lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0936012lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2269219lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1552664lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2269219pubmed:dateCreated1991-2-21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2269219pubmed:abstractTextThis study extensively compares two statistical models for the analysis of binary data from longitudinal studies. The first model was proposed by Zeger, Liang, and Self, which was abbreviated as ZLS model and another model was proposed by Origasa. The comparison focuses on both analytical and statistical view-points. The first discusses a type of the models and the second evaluates the effect from model misspecification by stimulation, assuming that the ZLS model is true.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2269219pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2269219pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2269219pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2269219pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2269219pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2269219pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2269219pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2269219pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2269219pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2269219pubmed:monthJullld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2269219pubmed:issn0091-6765lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2269219pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KnokeJ DJDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2269219pubmed:authorpubmed-author:OrigasaHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2269219pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2269219pubmed:volume87lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2269219pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2269219pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2269219pubmed:pagination143-7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2269219pubmed:dateRevised2009-11-18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2269219pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2269219-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2269219pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2269219-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2269219pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2269219-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2269219pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2269219-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2269219pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2269219-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2269219pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2269219-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2269219pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2269219-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2269219pubmed:year1990lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2269219pubmed:articleTitleA comparative study of two statistical models for the analysis of binary data from longitudinal studies.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2269219pubmed:affiliationEisai Company, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2269219pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2269219pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed