Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:21328172rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21328172lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0021888lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:21328172lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0242485lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:21328172lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0449851lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:21328172pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21328172pubmed:dateCreated2011-2-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21328172pubmed:abstractTextThe correct interpretation of measured tonometric values has become more and more complex in recent years. Large clinical studies have shown that an average central corneal thickness (CCT) of 550 µm can be assumed for the general population. Since the standard Glodmann applanation tonometry is based on a central corneal thickness of 520 µm, mathematical correction formula have been discussed for calculation of the true intraocular pressure. Newer tonometry devices, e. g. the dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) which seems to be independent from CCT, or the Ocular Response Analyzer® (ORA), taking into account the biomechanical properties of the cornea, have been designed to measure intraocular pressure (IOP). In this article, several IOP measurement devices and their clinical relevance for a correct and feasible determination of the IOP are discussed.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21328172pubmed:languagegerlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21328172pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21328172pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21328172pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21328172pubmed:monthFeblld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21328172pubmed:issn1439-3999lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21328172pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NeuburgerMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21328172pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JordanJ FJFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21328172pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DietleinT STSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21328172pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RosentreterAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21328172pubmed:copyrightInfo© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21328172pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21328172pubmed:volume228lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21328172pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21328172pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21328172pubmed:pagination118-24lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21328172pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21328172...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21328172pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21328172...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21328172pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21328172...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21328172pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21328172...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21328172pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21328172...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21328172pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21328172...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21328172pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21328172...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21328172pubmed:year2011lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21328172pubmed:articleTitle[Techniques of intraocular pressure measurement].lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21328172pubmed:affiliationAugenklinik, Universitätsklinik Freiburg. matthias.neuburger@uniklinik-freiburg.delld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21328172pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21328172pubmed:publicationTypeEnglish Abstractlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21328172pubmed:publicationTypeReviewlld:pubmed