| pubmed-article:21147821 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0086418 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0016163 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1281743 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0796358 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1511726 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0752095 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0220825 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0162789 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0036397 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0449851 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1524063 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:issue | 2 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2011-1-24 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:abstractText | Recent studies have suggested that biopsy of several trophectoderm (TE) cells from blastocysts followed by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analysis might represent an optimal strategy for aneuploidy detection, but few data on accuracy are available. The main question concerns the rate of mosaicism at the blastocyst stage, and to what extent this might cause misdiagnoses. We assessed blastocyst aneuploidy and mosaicism rates and evaluated the accuracy and efficiency of CGH and microarray-CGH (aCGH) for TE analysis. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:month | Feb | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:issn | 1460-2350 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:WellsDaganD | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:GordonAnthony... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:FragouliElpid... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:AlfarawatiSam... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:ManiaAnastasi... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:DaphnisDanny... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:GoodallN-Neka... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:GriffithsTrac... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:issnType | Electronic | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:volume | 26 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:pagination | 480-90 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21147821... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21147821... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21147821... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21147821... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21147821... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21147821... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21147821... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21147821... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21147821... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21147821... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21147821... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21147821... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21147821... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:year | 2011 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:articleTitle | Cytogenetic analysis of human blastocysts with the use of FISH, CGH and aCGH: scientific data and technical evaluation. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:affiliation | Nuffield Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK. elpida.fragouli@obs-gyn.ox.ac.uk | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:publicationType | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21147821 | pubmed:publicationType | Evaluation Studies | lld:pubmed |
