Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2071200rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0008976lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2071200lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034656lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2071200lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0027342lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2071200lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0019552lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2071200lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0015811lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2071200lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0162385lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2071200lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0023981lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2071200lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0301559lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:dateCreated1991-8-21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:abstractTextOver a 14-month period, 100 consecutive cases of intertrochanteric fracture were randomly allocated to be treated by either Pugh nail-plate or Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) fixation. Although there were 11 cases of malreduction and/or suboptimal positioning of the fixation device in the femoral head, only two of these gave long-term problems. Despite the difference in configuration of the devices and a considerable disparity in price, patient satisfaction and the incidence of untoward radiological features at an average of 6 months after surgery were similar in the two groups. A trifin-ended device would thus appear to be a reliable alternative to the more commonly used hip screw systems for intertrochanteric fracture.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:monthMaylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:issn0020-1383lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RowleyD IDIlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:authorpubmed-author:McLarenC ACAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BuckleyJ RJRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:volume22lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:pagination193-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2071200-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2071200-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2071200-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2071200-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2071200-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2071200-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2071200-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2071200-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2071200-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2071200-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2071200-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2071200-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:year1991lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:articleTitleIntertrochanteric fractures of the femur: a randomized prospective trial comparing the Pugh nail with the dynamic hip screw.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Orthopaedic and Traumatic Surgery, Dundee Royal Infirmary, UK.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071200pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed