pubmed-article:2022016 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0030705 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:2022016 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0085590 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:2022016 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0729580 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:2022016 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1707455 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:2022016 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1442989 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:2022016 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0920725 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:2022016 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0162563 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:2022016 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0013812 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:2022016 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0521116 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:issue | 5 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:dateCreated | 1991-6-6 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:abstractText | Two catheter electrode systems were compared for delivering radiofrequency current for ablation of the atrioventricular junction. Seventeen patients with drug-resistant supraventricular tachyarrhythmias were studied. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:grant | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:citationSubset | AIM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:month | May | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:issn | 0009-7322 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:KuckK HKH | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:RomanCC | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:BowmanA JAJ | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:JackmanW MWM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:NaccarelliG... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:WangX ZXZ | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:FridayK JKJ | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:FitzgeraldD... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:MoultonKK | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:MargolisP DPD | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:volume | 83 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:authorsComplete | N | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:pagination | 1562-76 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2010-3-24 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2022016-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2022016-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2022016-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2022016-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2022016-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2022016-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2022016-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2022016-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2022016-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2022016-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2022016-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:year | 1991 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:articleTitle | Catheter ablation of atrioventricular junction using radiofrequency current in 17 patients. Comparison of standard and large-tip catheter electrodes. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:affiliation | Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City 73190. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:publicationType | Comparative Study | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:publicationType | Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2022016 | pubmed:publicationType | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:2022016 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:2022016 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:2022016 | lld:pubmed |