Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:19585702rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19585702lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0085590lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19585702lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0521329lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19585702lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205527lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19585702lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1708096lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19585702lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0180499lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19585702lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0441587lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19585702pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19585702pubmed:dateCreated2009-7-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19585702pubmed:abstractTextThe placement of lumbar spinal drains is being done with increasing frequency to facilitate high-risk surgical procedures. One risk associated with these procedures is catheter shearing, resulting in a retained foreign body in the intrathecal space. Unlike retained epidural fragments, there are no guidelines on the management of this complication. The purpose of this article was to synthesize the literature on this subject to come up with guidelines for preventing and managing this complication.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19585702pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19585702pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19585702pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19585702pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19585702pubmed:issn1532-8651lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19585702pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GuptaAnitaAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19585702pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CohenSteven...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19585702pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ForsytheAkara...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19585702pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19585702pubmed:volume34lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19585702pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19585702pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19585702pubmed:pagination375-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19585702pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19585702...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19585702pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19585702...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19585702pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19585702...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19585702pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19585702...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19585702pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19585702...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19585702pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19585702...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19585702pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19585702...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19585702pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19585702...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19585702pubmed:articleTitleRetained intrathecal catheter fragment after spinal drain insertion.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19585702pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19585702pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19585702pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19585702pubmed:publicationTypeReviewlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19585702pubmed:publicationTypeCase Reportslld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19585702pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed