Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:19201635rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19201635lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030705lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19201635lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0016658lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19201635lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0035647lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19201635lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205307lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19201635lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1443182lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19201635lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1441506lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19201635lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707391lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19201635lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0444686lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19201635lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1711260lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19201635lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1515021lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19201635pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19201635pubmed:dateCreated2009-5-11lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19201635pubmed:abstractTextThe World Health Organization fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) uses clinical risk factors to predict the patient's 10-yr probability of sustaining a hip or other major osteoporosis-related fracture. Inclusion of the femoral neck T-score is optional in the calculation. We evaluated the impact of including the T-score in the calculation of fracture risk and resultant treatment recommendation. We retrospectively reviewed charts of 180 white women scanned on a Hologic dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). FRAX scores were calculated with T-scores (FRAX+) and without T-scores (FRAX-). We compared the National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) treatment recommendations (>or=20% risk of a major osteoporotic fracture or >or=3% risk of hip fracture for osteopenic patients) between FRAX+ and FRAX- scores. Agreement between FRAX+ and FRAX- was 89.4%. Disagreement occurred in 2 distinct subgroups of patients (10.6% of cases), that is, FRAX+ scores exceeded the NOF recommended treatment thresholds and FRAX- scores did not, or vice versa. One subgroup comprised older patients with normal T-scores for whom FRAX- scores exceeded the treatment threshold. The second subgroup comprised younger patients with high body mass index (BMI) and low T-scores for whom FRAX- scores did not exceed the treatment threshold. FRAX scores generated without T-scores may lead to treatment recommendations for patients who have normal bone mineral density and no treatment recommendations for patients who have osteoporosis. T-scores should be used for optimal application of FRAX.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19201635pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19201635pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19201635pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19201635pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19201635pubmed:issn1094-6950lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19201635pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HamdyRonald...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19201635pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KiebzakGary...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19201635pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19201635pubmed:volume12lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19201635pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19201635pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19201635pubmed:pagination158-61lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19201635pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19201635...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19201635pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19201635...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19201635pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19201635...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19201635pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19201635...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19201635pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19201635...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19201635pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19201635...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19201635pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19201635...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19201635pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19201635...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19201635pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19201635...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19201635pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19201635...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19201635pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19201635...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19201635pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19201635...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19201635pubmed:articleTitleVariance in 10-year fracture risk calculated with and without T-scores in select subgroups of normal and osteoporotic patients.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19201635pubmed:affiliationOsteoporosis Center, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA; VAMC, Johnson City, TN, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19201635pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed