| pubmed-article:19054289 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0043015 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0011441 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0010384 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0205246 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0033080 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0332306 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:issue | 2 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2009-6-15 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:abstractText | The aim of this investigation was to describe the quality of prescription and fabrication of single-unit crowns by general dental practitioners in Wales. One hundred pre-piloted questionnaires were distributed to commercial laboratories in Wales with large catchment areas, and 20 pre-piloted questionnaires were distributed to the production laboratory at the Cardiff Dental Hospital. Information was collected relating to the quality of prescription and master impressions for single-unit crowns. One hundred and seven completed questionnaires were returned (response rate = 89%). Sixty per cent (n = 64) of questionnaires related to single-unit crowns being made in general practice under private funding arrangements, 30% (n = 32) were being made in general dental practice under National Health Service (public) funding arrangements and 10% (n = 11) were collected from the Dental Hospital. Polyvinylsiloxane impression material was used to record the master impression in all cases (n = 107). Plastic stock trays were used to make the master impression in 79% of cases (n = 85), metal stock trays were used in 19% of cases (n = 20) and special trays were used in 2% of cases (n = 2). Eighty-five per cent (n = 91) of master casts were considered to be adequate for crown fabrication. Less than 50% of written instructions (n = 52) were considered 'clear' and of sufficient detail to adequately specify the planned crown. In 21% of cases (n = 22), the technician had to contact the dentist for clarification of the design prior to making the crown. While the quality of impression making for single-unit crowns was of a reasonable standard, the quality of the accompanying written communication was poor and more than one-half of written instructions examined failed to meet the requirements of the European Union Medical Devices Directive. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:citationSubset | D | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:month | Feb | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:issn | 1365-2842 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:LynchC DCD | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:JenkinsS JSJ | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:SloanA JAJ | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:GilmourA S... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:issnType | Electronic | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:volume | 36 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:pagination | 150-6 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19054289... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19054289... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19054289... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19054289... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19054289... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19054289... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19054289... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19054289... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19054289... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19054289... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19054289... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19054289... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:year | 2009 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:articleTitle | Quality of prescription and fabrication of single-unit crowns by general dental practitioners in Wales. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:affiliation | School of Dentistry, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:19054289 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
