Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:1761611rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1761611lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0021270lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1761611lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0856983lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1761611lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1705241lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1761611lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1705242lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1761611pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1761611pubmed:dateCreated1992-2-11lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1761611pubmed:abstractTextThe two- and three-syllable reduplicative babbling of five French-learning and five English-learning infants (0;5 to 1;1) was examined in two ways for intonational differences. The first measure was a categorization into one of five categories (RISING, FALLING, RISE-FALL, FALL-RISE, LEVEL) by expert listeners. The second was the fundamental frequency (F0) from the early, middle and late portion of each syllable. Both measures showed significant differences between the two language groups. 65% of the utterances from both groups were classified as either rising of falling. For the French children, these were divided equally into the rising and the falling categories, while 75% of those utterances for the English children were judged to have falling intonation. Proportions of the other three categories were not significantly different by language environment. In both languages, though, three-syllable utterances were more likely to have a complex contour than two-syllable ones. Analysis of the F0 patterns confirmed the perceptual assessment. Several aspects of the target languages help explain these intonational differences in prelinguistic babbling.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1761611pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1761611pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1761611pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1761611pubmed:citationSubsetClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1761611pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1761611pubmed:monthOctlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1761611pubmed:issn0305-0009lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1761611pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WangQQlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1761611pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LevittA GAGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1761611pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WhalenD HDHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1761611pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1761611pubmed:volume18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1761611pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1761611pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1761611pubmed:pagination501-16lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1761611pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1761611pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1761611-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1761611pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1761611-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1761611pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1761611-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1761611pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1761611-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1761611pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1761611-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1761611pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1761611-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1761611pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1761611-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1761611pubmed:year1991lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1761611pubmed:articleTitleIntonational differences between the reduplicative babbling of French- and English-learning infants.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1761611pubmed:affiliationHaskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT 06511.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1761611pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1761611pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1761611pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.lld:pubmed