| pubmed-article:17045857 | pubmed:abstractText | We report a case of hepatocellular carcinoma superimposed on chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) hepatitis in which final diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma was delayed because there was no consensus on hypervascularity with two diagnostic methods at the time of presentation. A 3 cm lesion was initially observed as hypovascular at multidetector-row computed tomography. Conversely, two months later the lesion appeared hypervascular at contrast-ultrasonography and gadolinium-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance, and hyperintense after superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced T2W studies. Only in the late follow-up it was definitively confirmed as hypervascular in the arterial phase of multidetector-row computed tomography. This case clearly highlights some pitfalls in the European Association for the study of the liver guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma management, which were readdressed in the last American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) and in the forthcoming international proposals, leading to more pragmatic suggestions for clinical practice. | lld:pubmed |
