pubmed-article:17030080 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0521425 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:17030080 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0597198 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:17030080 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0337050 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:17030080 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0597443 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:17030080 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1705241 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:17030080 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0332453 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:17030080 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1705242 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:issue | 1 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2007-3-5 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:abstractText | An assessment of the steroid estrogen removing performance of 23 different sewage treatment plants (STPs) was performed. The assessment relied on a model to estimate influent concentrations, and completed questionnaires on the STP treatment details from the relevant water companies. This information was compared with observed effluent 17beta-estradiol (E2) and estrone (E1) concentrations. The 10 biological filter plants (BFP) in the study performed poorly with only 30% (SD 31) removal on average for E1. This reduced E1 removal performance of the BFPs compared to all the other STP types in the survey was statistically significant (p<0.001). Scenarios of all the STPs as activated sludge types, and one as all BFP types were modelled using the GREAT-ER model set up for the Aire/Calder catchment in the UK. This difference was shown to have an important effect on predicted river E1 concentrations and consequent risk classifications. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:month | May | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:issn | 0269-7491 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:JohnsonAndrew... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:WilliamsRicha... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:KandaRakeshR | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:SimpsonPeteP | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:volume | 147 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:pagination | 194-202 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17030080... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17030080... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17030080... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17030080... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17030080... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17030080... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17030080... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17030080... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17030080... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17030080... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17030080... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17030080... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17030080... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:year | 2007 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:articleTitle | What difference might sewage treatment performance make to endocrine disruption in rivers? | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:affiliation | Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK. ajo@ceh.ac.uk | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:publicationType | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17030080 | pubmed:publicationType | Evaluation Studies | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:17030080 | lld:pubmed |