Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:16858433rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0015392lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16858433lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0025663lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16858433lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0444706lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16858433lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16858433lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1832072lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16858433lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2346753lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:dateCreated2008-1-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:abstractTextTo compare the accommodative amplitudes with three different methods in pseudophakic eyes with different types of intraocular lenses (IOLs).lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:monthJanlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:issn0950-222Xlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NemethGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BerstMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SohajdaZZlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Tsorbatzoglou...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:authorpubmed-author:VamosiPPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:volume22lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:pagination65-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:dateRevised2009-11-3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16858433...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16858433...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16858433...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16858433...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16858433...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16858433...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16858433...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16858433...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16858433...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16858433...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16858433...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16858433...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:year2008lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:articleTitleA comparison of accommodation amplitudes in pseudophakic eyes measured with three different methods.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:affiliation1Department of Ophthalmology, Medical Health and Science Center, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary. nemeth222@yahoo.comlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16858433pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed