Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:16789709rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16789709lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030705lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16789709lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0282366lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16789709lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1318453lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16789709lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0178784lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16789709lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1548893lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16789709lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1706778lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16789709lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0042295lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16789709pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16789709pubmed:dateCreated2006-6-22lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16789709pubmed:abstractTextBecause the supply of deceased donor organs fails to meet demand, patients needing a transplant frequently have lengthy waits or die while waiting. In an effort to reduce waiting times, the concept of "preferred status" has emerged. In the United States, preferred status has taken the form of a community of individuals called LifeSharers. Using directed donation, this group aims to facilitate priority organ allocation to its members-people who have agreed to be organ donors. Such preferred status programs increase societal awareness about organ donation and transplantation, but they are not without ethical controversy, as some term them "clubs." In the case of LifeSharers, the potential to increase the pool of deceased donor organs is a worthy goal that would benefit the community of patients awaiting transplantation, not just LifeSharers members.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16789709pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16789709pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16789709pubmed:citationSubsetNlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16789709pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16789709pubmed:monthJunlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16789709pubmed:issn1526-9248lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16789709pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BramstedtKatr...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16789709pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16789709pubmed:volume16lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16789709pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16789709pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16789709pubmed:pagination170-4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16789709pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16789709...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16789709pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16789709...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16789709pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16789709...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16789709pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16789709...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16789709pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16789709...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16789709pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16789709...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16789709pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16789709...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16789709pubmed:year2006lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16789709pubmed:articleTitleIs it ethical to prioritize patients for organ allocation according to their values about organ donation?lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16789709pubmed:affiliationCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16789709pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed