Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:16303611rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0028128lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:issue1-4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:dateCreated2005-11-23lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:abstractTextNitric oxide (NO) has been reported to be luteolytic based on treatment of cows in vivo with an inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase (NOS-produces NO), which delayed the decline in progesterone by two to three days [Jaroszewki J, Hansel, W. Intraluteal administration of a nitric oxide synthase blocker stimulates progesterone, oxytocin secretion and prolongs the life span of the bovine corpus luteum. Proc Soc Exptl Biol Med 2000;224:50-5; Skarzynski D, Jaroszewki J, Bah, M, et al. Administration of nitric oxide synthase inhibitor counteracts prostaglandin F(2alpha)-induced luteolysis in cattle. Biol Reprod 2003;68:1674-81]. The objective of this experiment was to determine the effect of a long acting NO donor or a NOS inhibitor infused chronically into the interstitial tissue of the ovarian vascular pedicle adjacent to the ovary with a corpus luteum on secretion of progesterone during the ovine estrous cycle. Ewes were treated either with Vehicle (N=5); Diethylenetriamine (DETA-control for DETA-NONOate; N=5); (Z)-1-[2-(2-aminoethyl)-N-(2-ammonioethyl) amino]diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (DETA-NONOate-long acting NO donor; N=6); or l-nitro-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME-NOS inhibitor; N=6) every 6 h from 24:00 h (0 h) on day 8 through 18:00 h on day 18 of the estrous cycle. Jugular venous blood was collected every 6h for analysis for progesterone and corpora lutea were collected at 18:00 h on day 18 and weighed. Weights of corpora lutea were heavier (P< or =0.05) in DETA-NONOate-treated ewes when compared to Vehicle, DETA, or l-NAME-treated ewes, which did not differ amongst each other (P> or =0.05). Profiles of progesterone in jugular venous blood on days 8-18 differed (P< or =0.05) in DETA-NONOate-treated ewes when compared to Vehicle, DETA, or l-NAME-treated ewes did not differ (P> or =0.05) amongst each other. It is concluded that NO is not luteolytic during the ovine estrous cycle, but may instead be antiluteolytic and prevent luteolysis.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:issn1098-8823lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:authorpubmed-author:OnoYYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GotoKKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RaneyAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WeemsC WCWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WeemsY SYSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:authorpubmed-author:UchimaTTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ZaleskiHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LennonEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:volume78lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:pagination129-38lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16303611...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16303611...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16303611...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16303611...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16303611...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16303611...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16303611...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16303611...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16303611...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16303611...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:year2005lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:articleTitleIs nitric oxide luteolytic or antiluteolytic?lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Human Nutrition, Food, and Animal Sciences, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16303611pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.lld:pubmed