Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:16275257rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0013935lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16275257lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0085590lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16275257lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0013938lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16275257lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1510420lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16275257lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332281lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16275257lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205216lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16275257lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1705822lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16275257lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0348011lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16275257lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0021149lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:issue5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:dateCreated2005-11-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:abstractTextAfter initiating a policy of ultrasound-guided miduterine cavity embryo transfer (ET) on August 1, 2001, the incidence of retained embryos in the transfer catheter declined significantly from 4.2% (46 of 1,101 ETs) during the time interval January 1, 2000 to July 31, 2001, to 0.7% (6 of 908 ETs) during the time interval August 1, 2001 to December 31, 2002. Blood on the transfer catheter (38% vs. 19%) occurred with significantly greater frequency at ET in which embryos were retained; ETs of > or =4 embryos were more likely to be associated with retained embryos than ETs of <4 embryos (3.7% vs. 2.2%), and both the clinical pregnancy rate (PR) and implantation rate (IR) were lower when embryo retention occurred at ET than they were when embryos were not retained (25% vs. 34% clinical PR; 12% vs. 19% IR).lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:monthNovlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:issn1556-5653lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TrimarchiJame...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WeitzenSherry...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FrankfurterDa...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PloskerShayne...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ShackeltonReb...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SilbersteinTa...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:volume84lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:pagination1510-2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16275257...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16275257...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16275257...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16275257...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16275257...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16275257...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16275257...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16275257...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16275257...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16275257...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16275257...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16275257...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16275257...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:year2005lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:articleTitleUltrasound-guided miduterine cavity embryo transfer is associated with a decreased incidence of retained embryos in the transfer catheter.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:affiliationDivision of Biology and Medicine, Brown Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16275257pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed