Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:1616379rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0010055lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1616379lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0190211lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1616379lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0596545lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1616379lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0522523lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1616379lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0175673lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1616379lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0231175lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:issue5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:dateCreated1992-7-30lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:abstractTextSix hundred ninety-nine patients have required emergency coronary artery bypass after failed elective percutaneous coronary angioplasty during the decade September 1980 through December 1990. This represents 4% of 9860 patients having 12,146 elective percutaneous coronary angioplasty procedures during this interval. Emergency coronary artery bypass was required for acute refractory myocardial ischemia in 82%. Hospital mortality rate for all patients was 3.1%; 3.7% in patients with refractory myocardial ischemia but 0.8% in patients without refractory myocardial ischemia, p = 0.08. Postprocedural Q-wave myocardial infarctions were observed in 21% versus 2.4%, p less than 0.0001, and intra-aortic balloon pumping was required in 19% with versus 0.8% without refractory myocardial ischemia, p less than 0.0001. Multivessel disease, p = 0.004, age older than 65 years, p = 0.005, and refractory myocardial ischemia, p = 0.08, interacted to produce the highest risk of in-hospital death. Follow-up shows that there have been 28 additional late deaths, including 23 of cardiac causes for a 91% survival at 5 years. Freedom from both late death and Q-wave myocardial infarction at 5 years was 61%. In the group going to emergency coronary artery bypass with refractory myocardial ischemia, the late cardiac survival was 90%, and in those without ischemia, 92% at 5 years, p = not significant. The MI--free survival in the group with refractory ischemia, however, was 56% versus 83% in the group without ischemia, p less than 0.0001. Multivariate analysis showed the highest late event rates for patients with Q-wave myocardial infarction at the initial emergency coronary artery bypass, age older than 65 years, angina class III or IV, and prior coronary bypass surgery. In spite of a continuing high incidence of early acute myocardial infarction and an increasing operative mortality rate (7%) in the latest 3 years cohort of patients, excellent late survival and low subsequent cardiac event rates demonstrate the lasting effectiveness of prompt, successful emergency coronary bypass surgery for failed percutaneous coronary angioplasty.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:monthMaylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:issn0003-4932lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JonesE LELlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CravenJ AJAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HatcherC...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GuytonR ARAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WeintraubW...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:volume215lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:pagination425-33; discussion 433-4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:dateRevised2010-11-18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1616379-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1616379-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1616379-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1616379-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1616379-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1616379-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1616379-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1616379-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1616379-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1616379-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1616379-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1616379-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1616379-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1616379-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1616379-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1616379-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:year1992lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:articleTitleEmergency coronary artery bypass surgery for failed percutaneous coronary angioplasty. A 10-year experience.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:affiliationJoseph B. Whitehead Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1616379pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1616379lld:pubmed