| pubmed-article:15657655 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0030705 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0007113 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0038954 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:issue | 12 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2005-1-19 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:abstractText | Although it is generally believed that young patients with rectal cancer have worse survival rates, no comprehensive analysis has been reported. This study uses a national-level, population-based cancer registry to compare rectal cancer outcomes between young vs. older populations. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:month | Dec | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:issn | 0012-3706 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:KoClifford... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:MaggardMelind... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:EtzioniDavid... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:LiuJerome HJH | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:O'ConnellJess... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:volume | 47 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:pagination | 2064-9 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2006-11-15 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15657655... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15657655... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15657655... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15657655... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15657655... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15657655... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15657655... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15657655... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15657655... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15657655... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15657655... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15657655... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15657655... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15657655... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15657655... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15657655... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15657655... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15657655... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15657655... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15657655... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15657655... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15657655... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15657655... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15657655... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:year | 2004 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:articleTitle | Are survival rates different for young and older patients with rectal cancer? | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:affiliation | Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA. jbocjboc@hotmail.com | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:publicationType | Comparative Study | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15657655 | pubmed:publicationType | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:15657655 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:15657655 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:15657655 | lld:pubmed |
