Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:15638259rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0001675lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15638259lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0043227lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15638259lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205245lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15638259lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0220825lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15638259lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0237828lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15638259lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1516240lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:dateCreated2005-1-10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:abstractTextAim of this study was to investigate test-retest reliability of the Isernhagen Work System Functional Capacity Evaluation (IWS FCE) in healthy subjects. The IWS FCE consists of 28 tests that reflect work-related activities such as lifting, carrying, bending, etc. A convenience sample of 26 healthy subjects participated in the study. The subjects' mean age was 34.9 years. Two FCE sessions were held within a 2-3 week interval. Descriptives per session, Intra Class Correlations (ICC), limits of agreement, Cohen's Kappa, and percentage of agreement were calculated where appropriate. An ICC of > or =0.75, a Kappa value > or =0.60, and a percentage of absolute agreement of > or =80% were considered acceptable reliability. Acceptable reliability was demonstrated for seven out of nine tests (78%) of the material handling group and the shuttle walk test based on ICC analyses only. Sixteen out of 17 criterion and ceiling tests (94%) showed acceptable reliability based on Kappa values and percentage of agreement. Of these 17 tests, 8 were eligible for further analysis, and of those 8 tests the reliability of one test was acceptable based on ICC analyses (13%). In conclusion, the test-retest reliability of the material-handling group is acceptable. Crude analyses of the ceiling and criterion tests reveal acceptable test-retest reliability of most, but not all, tests.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:issn1053-0487lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DijkstraP UPUlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GroothoffJ...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BrouwerSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RenemanM FMFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GeertzenJ H...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MeinemaAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:volume14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:pagination295-305lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15638259...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15638259...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15638259...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15638259...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15638259...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15638259...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15638259...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15638259...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15638259...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15638259...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:year2004lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:articleTitleTest-retest reliability of the Isernhagen Work Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation in healthy adults.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:affiliationCenter for Rehabilitation, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands. m.reneman@beatrixoord.nllld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15638259pubmed:publicationTypeValidation Studieslld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:15638259lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:15638259lld:pubmed