Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:1551627rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1551627lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205093lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1551627lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0178602lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1551627lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0392756lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1551627lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1579762lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1551627lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0009491lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1551627pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1551627pubmed:dateCreated1992-4-30lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1551627pubmed:abstractTextThanks to their capability for post-processing of image data, the digital radiological techniques introduced from 1970 onwards permit dose reduction with no loss of clinical information. The aim of this study was to establish the extent of possible dose reduction in orthodontic lateral cephalography. For this purpose, lateral cephalograms of a head phantom taken with varying radiation doses (5 to 150 mAs, constant 70 kV) were evaluated. The evaluations of ten judges were compared statistically. Conventional lateral cephalograms showed a statistically proven superiority of a number of exposure parameters for the sagittal and vertical localisation of reference points. This correlated with the radiological density of the structures. In contrast to the conventional technique, the reference points in all images obtained by digital luminescence radiography showed no such tendency. Digital luminescence thus meets the clinical need to reduce radiation dose (to about 20% of the usual dose) while providing no less diagnostic information.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1551627pubmed:languagegerlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1551627pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1551627pubmed:citationSubsetDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1551627pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1551627pubmed:monthFeblld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1551627pubmed:issn0015-816Xlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1551627pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SerglH GHGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1551627pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RuppenthalTTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1551627pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FrickeBBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1551627pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DollGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1551627pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1551627pubmed:volume53lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1551627pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1551627pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1551627pubmed:pagination40-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1551627pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1551627pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1551627-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1551627pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1551627-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1551627pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1551627-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1551627pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1551627-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1551627pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1551627-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1551627pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1551627-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1551627pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1551627-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1551627pubmed:year1992lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1551627pubmed:articleTitle[A comparative study of the possibility of reducing the dosage in lateral teleradiographs].lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1551627pubmed:affiliationPoliklinik für Kieferorthopädie, Universitätsklinik Mainz.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1551627pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1551627pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1551627pubmed:publicationTypeEnglish Abstractlld:pubmed