Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:15104167rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15104167lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0599295lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15104167lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0017612lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15104167lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0031061lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15104167lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1522577lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15104167lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15104167lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1948023lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15104167lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0180683lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15104167lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1551083lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15104167lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0456962lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15104167lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205292lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15104167lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0441463lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15104167pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15104167pubmed:dateCreated2004-4-23lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15104167pubmed:abstractTextTo compare changes in the mfERG to visual field changes observed in OAG.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15104167pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15104167pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15104167pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15104167pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15104167pubmed:monthJanlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15104167pubmed:issn0012-4486lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15104167pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RuprechtKlaus...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15104167pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PalmowskiAnja...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15104167pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15104167pubmed:volume108lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15104167pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15104167pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15104167pubmed:pagination55-60lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15104167pubmed:dateRevised2010-11-18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15104167pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15104167...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15104167pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15104167...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15104167pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15104167...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15104167pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15104167...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15104167pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15104167...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15104167pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15104167...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15104167pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15104167...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15104167pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15104167...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15104167pubmed:year2004lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15104167pubmed:articleTitleFollow up in open angle glaucoma. A comparison of static perimetry and the fast stimulation mfERG. Multifocal ERG follow up in open angle glaucoma.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15104167pubmed:affiliationUniversitätsaugenklinik, 66421 Homburg, Germany. palmowskia@uhbs.chlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15104167pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15104167pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15104167pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed