Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:14021544rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14021544lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0004651lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:14021544lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0025663lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:14021544lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:14021544pubmed:dateCreated1963-12-1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14021544pubmed:abstractTextA wide variety of bacteriophages were processed and stored under different conditions to compare methods for long-term preservation. Specimens were stored for 2 years at room temperature (24 to 28 C) and at 4 C as broth lysates in 50% glycerol, dried, and freeze-dried. Titers determined after processing indicated that, of the broth, glycerol, and freeze-dry methods, freeze-drying was most damaging to the phages tested, glycerol less damaging, and the broth method least damaging. After 2 years, titers of broth lysates were generally higher than those of glycerol or freeze-dried preparations. Dried preparations generally did not prove satisfactory. Preparations stored at 4 C showed better titers than those kept at room temperature. All titers declined with time regardless of the conditions of preservation.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14021544pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14021544pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14021544pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14021544pubmed:keywordhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14021544pubmed:keywordhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14021544pubmed:keywordhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14021544pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14021544pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14021544pubmed:citationSubsetOMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14021544pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14021544pubmed:monthSeplld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14021544pubmed:issn0003-6919lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14021544pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CLARKW AWAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14021544pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14021544pubmed:volume10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14021544pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14021544pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14021544pubmed:pagination466-71lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14021544pubmed:dateRevised2009-11-18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14021544pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:14021544...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14021544pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:14021544...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14021544pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:14021544...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14021544pubmed:year1962lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14021544pubmed:articleTitleComparison of several methods for preserving bacteriophages.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14021544pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:14021544lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:14021544lld:pubmed