Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:1366723rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1366723lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0010453lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1366723lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0025663lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1366723lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0020204lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1366723lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1366723lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1328929lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1366723pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1366723pubmed:dateCreated1991-1-29lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1366723pubmed:abstractTextA major variable to consider in the production of biologicals from mammalian cell cultures is the mode of operation, be it a batch, continuous, perfusion, fed-batch or other production method. The final choice must consider a number of fundamental and economic issues. Here we present some antibody production data from different cell lines using different modes of production and discuss the important factors for consideration in choosing a production strategy. It was found that the productivity of batch cultures was lower than that obtained in continuous and perfused cultures, but that productivity could be improved by implementing suitable feeding strategies. The antibody productivity of one cell line, MCL1, during exponential phase was not affected by media type or glucose level. The maximum productivity of two cell lines in continuous culture was found to occur at dilution rates below the maximum, from 0.019 to 0.030 hr-1.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1366723pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1366723pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1366723pubmed:citationSubsetBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1366723pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1366723pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1366723pubmed:monthJullld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1366723pubmed:issn0920-9069lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1366723pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BarfordJ PJPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1366723pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HarbourCClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1366723pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LowK SKSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1366723pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MarquisC PCPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1366723pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1366723pubmed:volume4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1366723pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1366723pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1366723pubmed:pagination69-76lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1366723pubmed:dateRevised2008-10-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1366723pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1366723-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1366723pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1366723-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1366723pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1366723-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1366723pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1366723-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1366723pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1366723-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1366723pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1366723-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1366723pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1366723-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1366723pubmed:year1990lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1366723pubmed:articleTitleA comparison of different culture methods for hybridoma propagation and monoclonal antibody production.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1366723pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Sydney, Australia.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1366723pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1366723pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed