Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:12898311rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0007303lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12898311lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0450127lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12898311lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0476169lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12898311lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1457869lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12898311lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0220825lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12898311lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1517004lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:dateCreated2003-8-4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:abstractTextThis study was conducted to evaluate the usefulness of osteochondral allografts for articular cartilage defects. Cartilaginous defects measuring 4.5 mm in diameter were experimentally prepared in both the weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing regions of the femur in six male miniature pigs (9 months old). Osteochondral grafting was performed using fresh autografts (group AU), fresh allografts (group AL), or frozen allografts (group FA). Untreated cartilaginous defects were used as the control (group D). All the pigs were killed 4 weeks later, and the respective osteochondral grafts were macro- and microscopically evaluated. Hematoxylin and eosin staining, safranin O staining, and immunostaining [matrix metalloprotease-1 (MMP-1) and tissue inhibitor of metalloprotease-2 (TIMP-2)] were used for the histological evaluations of transplanted cartilage. Macroscopic and microscopic findings were assessed according to the criteria proposed by Wakitani et al. Although groups AU and AL showed similar median scores (ranges) for the evaluation of cartilaginous defect restoration, groups FA and D showed unfavorable scores: 3.9 (0-9) in group AU; 4.5 (0-12) in group AL; 10.2 (4-12) in group FA; and 7.0 (5-11) in group D. Immunostaining revealed almost identical results in groups AU and AL. As there were no histologically significant differences in the status of the osteochondral grafts between fresh autografts and fresh allografts, fresh allografts might be useful donor osteochondral grafts.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:issn0949-2658lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:authorpubmed-author:IwataHisashiHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HasegawaYukih...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KitamuraShinj...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SakanoShinjiSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WarashinaHide...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MaruyamaShogo...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:authorpubmed-author:YamauchiKenic...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:volume8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:pagination560-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12898311...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12898311...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12898311...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12898311...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12898311...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12898311...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12898311...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12898311...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12898311...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12898311...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:year2003lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:articleTitleExperimental evaluation of the usefulness of osteochondral allograft for articular cartilage defect.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University, 65 Tsurumai, Shouwa-ku, 466-8550, Nagoya, Japan.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12898311pubmed:publicationTypeEvaluation Studieslld:pubmed