Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:12828378rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0043262lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12828378lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205101lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12828378lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12828378lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0441254lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:issue1-2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:dateCreated2003-6-27lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:abstractTextThe relative stiffness of five different external wrist fixators currently in use for distal radius fractures was determined using a uniform fracture model consisting of wood dowels to isolate the effects of the fixators themselves. Each construct was loaded in axial compression, eccentric and cantilever modes of bending, and torsion. The stiffest of the fixators varied by a factor of three in compression, five in bending, and three in torsion. Although the ideal stiffness of a wrist fixator is unknown, there is a large variation in the stiffness of existing devices.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:issn0018-5647lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChangDavidDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KovalKenneth...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KummerFrederi...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TejwaniNirmal...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WolinskyPhili...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:authorpubmed-author:EgolKenKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:volume61lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:pagination40-4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12828378...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12828378...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12828378...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12828378...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12828378...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12828378...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12828378...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12828378...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12828378...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12828378...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12828378...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12828378...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:articleTitleBiomechanical comparison of five external wrist fixators.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:affiliationNYU-Hospital for Joint Diseases, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York, New York 10003, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12828378pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed