Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:12753463rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0004611lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12753463lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0025663lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12753463lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12753463lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0162652lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12753463lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1533691lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12753463lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280519lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:dateCreated2003-5-19lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:abstractTextData obtained from studies on the antimicrobial properties of bonding agents are the subject of controversy, probably because of methodological differences. This study compared two commonly used in vitro methods, the disc agar diffusion test and the well agar diffusion test. Agar plates were seeded with Streptococcus sobrinus, Lactobacillus gasseri, or Actinomyces naeslundii. For the well diffusion test, wells cut out of the agar were filled with the test material, and for the disc method, discs impregnated with the test material were applied to the agar; the discs and wells were both 9 mm in diameter. After incubation, measurements of the zones of inhibition showed little agreement between the two methods when bonding agents were tested; the mean differences (+/- sdiff) in the zones of inhibition between the methods were 0.7 +/- 3.4 mm (P = 0.40, one sample t-test against zero), 4.9 +/- 4.4 mm (P = 0.97), and 0.8 +/- 4.3 mm (P = 0.47) for S. sobrinus, L. gasseri, and A. naeslundii, respectively. Mean differences were less contrasting when chlorhexidine and pure components were tested (P < 0.05 for S. sobrinus and L. gasseri). These results indicate the need for a gold standard method to evaluate the antimicrobial properties of bonding agents.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:citationSubsetDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:monthJunlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:issn0902-0055lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ZehnderMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SchmidlinP...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SchmidlinO...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:volume18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:pagination140-3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12753463...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12753463...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12753463...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12753463...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12753463...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12753463...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12753463...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12753463...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:year2003lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:articleTitleEffectiveness of dentine bonding agents against cariogenic bacteria in vitro: a comparison of two methods.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, Cariology, and Periodontology, University of Zürich Center for Dental Medicine, Zürich, Switzerland.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12753463pubmed:publicationTypeEvaluation Studieslld:pubmed