pubmed-article:12722388 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0031809 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:12722388 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0025663 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:12722388 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0476089 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:12722388 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C2347947 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:issue | 11 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2003-4-30 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:abstractText | Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy. The purpose of the study was to compare the reliability of different methods for diagnosing endometrial cancer. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:language | pol | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:month | Nov | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:issn | 0017-0011 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:JakowickiJerz... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:WróbelAndrzej... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:Ba?czerowskaM... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:SuchockiS?awo... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:volume | 73 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:pagination | 991-6 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2006-11-15 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12722388... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12722388... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12722388... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12722388... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12722388... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12722388... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12722388... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12722388... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12722388... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12722388... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12722388... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:year | 2002 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:articleTitle | [Assessment of the reliability of different methods in diagnosing endometrial cancer]. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:affiliation | Specjalistycznego Szpitala Ginekologiczno-Po?ozniczego im. E. Biernackiego w Wa?brzychu. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:publicationType | Comparative Study | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12722388 | pubmed:publicationType | English Abstract | lld:pubmed |