Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:12541126rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2926606lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12541126lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0011923lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12541126lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0008373lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12541126lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2607943lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12541126lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0032790lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12541126lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1609982lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12541126lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1511790lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12541126lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205265lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12541126lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205421lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12541126lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1555582lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:dateCreated2003-1-23lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:abstractTextOur objective was to assess the value of delayed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted spin-echo MR imaging in the detection of residual cholesteatoma in patients who have undergone canal wall-up tympanoplasty procedure. The MR imaging was obtained prior to revision surgery in 18 patients with opacity of the post-operative cavity at CT examination 12-18 months after canal wall-up tympanoplasty. In each patient the following was performed: precontrast T1- and T2-weighted images; and early and delayed contrast-enhanced axial and coronal T1-weighted imaging. Early and delayed MR imaging results were separately compared with surgical second-look findings. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were evaluated for early and delayed post-contrast MR imaging, compared with second-look surgery findings. A residual cholesteatoma was correctly identified in 8 of 9 cases with delayed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging. Mean sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and interobserver agreement (evaluated by kappa statistics) were, respectively, 85.2, 92.6, 92.6%, and kappa=0.78 for the delayed contrast-enhanced MR imaging technique. The same parameters were, respectively, 96.3, 33.3, 60.6, and 0.30 for the early contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR images. We conclude that delayed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging is reliable for the detection of residual cholesteatomas of the middle ear in patients who have undergone canal wall-up tympanoplasty.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:monthJanlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:issn0938-7994lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AlbertiCorinn...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AyacheDenisDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WilliamsMarc...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HéranFrançois...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LafitteFranço...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Elmaleh-Bergè...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PiekarskiJean...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:volume13lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:pagination169-74lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12541126...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12541126...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12541126...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12541126...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12541126...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12541126...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12541126...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12541126...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12541126...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12541126...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12541126...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12541126...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12541126...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12541126...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:year2003lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:articleTitleDetection of postoperative residual cholesteatoma with delayed contrast-enhanced MR imaging: initial findings.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Medical Imaging, Fondation Ophthalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, 25, rue Manin, 75940 Paris, France. mwilliams@fo-rothschild.frlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12541126pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:12541126lld:pubmed