pubmed-article:12478123 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0030705 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:12478123 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0376358 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:12478123 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0034656 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:12478123 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0220825 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:12478123 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0439801 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:12478123 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0242382 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:12478123 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0023981 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:12478123 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0392752 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:12478123 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0231449 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:issue | 1 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2002-12-12 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:abstractText | The low rate of pelvic node metastasis in most contemporary series of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for carcinoma of the prostate has been attributed to earlier and better patient selection than historical series. Alternatively, it has been suggested that the limited dissection commonly performed misses nodal metastasis in a substantial number of patients. To assess the value of an extended node dissection in detecting nodal metastasis, we performed a randomized prospective study. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:citationSubset | AIM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:month | Jan | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:issn | 0022-5347 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:ChangSam SSS | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:WellsNancyN | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:CooksonMichae... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:ParekhDipen... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:ClarkTravisT | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:SmithErnest... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:SmithJoseph... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:volume | 169 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:pagination | 145-7; discussion 147-8 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2006-11-15 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12478123... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12478123... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12478123... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12478123... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12478123... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12478123... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12478123... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12478123... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12478123... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12478123... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12478123... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12478123... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:year | 2003 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:articleTitle | Randomized prospective evaluation of extended versus limited lymph node dissection in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:affiliation | Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:publicationType | Clinical Trial | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:publicationType | Comparative Study | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:12478123 | pubmed:publicationType | Randomized Controlled Trial | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:12478123 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:12478123 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:12478123 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:12478123 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:12478123 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:12478123 | lld:pubmed |