Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:12419142rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0025663lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12419142lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0005976lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12419142lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0220825lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12419142lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12419142lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1440080lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12419142lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0175668lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12419142lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0450363lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:dateCreated2002-11-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:abstractTextTo determine the agreement between two-dimensional radiograph and three-dimensional CT in the evaluation of the secondary alveolar bone grafting.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:citationSubsetDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:monthMaylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:issn1002-0098lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MininiPPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MaLianLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JiaYilinYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:volume37lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:pagination194-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12419142...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12419142...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12419142...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12419142...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12419142...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12419142...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12419142...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12419142...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12419142...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12419142...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12419142...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12419142...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:year2002lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:articleTitleThe comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional methods in the evaluation of the secondary alveolar bone grafting.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Orthodontics, Peking University School of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12419142pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed