Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:1190281rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1190281lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0002418lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1190281lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0220908lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1190281pubmed:issue5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1190281pubmed:dateCreated1976-1-26lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1190281pubmed:abstractTextA stereoscopic test was developed for the visual screening of preschool children. The TNO test for stereoscopic vision utilized the same principle as the Julesz random-dot stereogram, and provided a simple and unequivocal test criterion understood even by young children. The results of a comprative evaluation of the TNO and Titmus stereoscopic tests proved the TNO test to be the more reliable of the two, particularly in the 2- to 4-year-old age range. Failure to pass this test at the 240 seconds of arc disparity level yielded an excellent screening criterion, as attested by the results of a validation experiment employing 81 patients (2 to 7 years old) with known visual health records. Furthermore, the screening results obtained from 129 preschool children (2 to 5 years old) tested in the classroom by a nonprofessional examiner, suggest that, under these more realistic conditions, the TNO test yields at least 60% less overreferrals than the Titmus test.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1190281pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1190281pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1190281pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1190281pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1190281pubmed:monthNovlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1190281pubmed:issn0002-9394lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1190281pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WalravenJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1190281pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1190281pubmed:volume80lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1190281pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1190281pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1190281pubmed:pagination893-900lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1190281pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1190281pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1190281-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1190281pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1190281-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1190281pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1190281-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1190281pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1190281-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1190281pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1190281-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1190281pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1190281-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1190281pubmed:year1975lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1190281pubmed:articleTitleAmblyopia screening with random-dot stereograms.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1190281pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1190281pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1190281lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1190281lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1190281lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1190281lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1190281lld:pubmed