Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:11771823rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0226037lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11771823lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1305163lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11771823lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0026597lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11771823lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:issue5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:dateCreated2001-12-28lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:abstractTextTo compare mitral annulus motion (MAM) with circumflex artery motion (CXM) and the motion amplitude at an endocardial site (representing MAM) with an epicardial site (representing CXM) at the most basal lateral part of the atrioventricular plane (AVP).lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:monthOctlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:issn1401-7431lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WandtBBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:authorpubmed-author:EmilssonKKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KähäriAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:volume35lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:pagination318-25lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11771823...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11771823...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11771823...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11771823...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11771823...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11771823...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11771823...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11771823...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11771823...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11771823...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11771823...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11771823...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11771823...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:year2001lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:articleTitleComparison between circumflex artery motion and mitral annulus motion.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Orebro Medical Centre Hospital, Sweden.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11771823pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed