Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:11685857rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0242485lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11685857lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1541822lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11685857lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0566690lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11685857lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0680738lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11685857lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2347946lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11685857lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0138547lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:issue42lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:dateCreated2001-10-31lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:abstractTextThe clinical significance of conjugata vera (CV) values for estimating the possibility of vaginal delivery when caesarean section (CS) has earlier been performed is uncertain and therefore the prognostic value of this parameter was examined.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:languagedanlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:monthOctlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:issn0041-5782lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WordTTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DeurellMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:day15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:volume163lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:pagination5832-5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11685857...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11685857...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11685857...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11685857...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11685857...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11685857...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11685857...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11685857...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11685857...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11685857...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11685857...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:year2001lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:articleTitle[Is CV measurement relevant for the verdict "vaginal delivery prohibited"?].lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:affiliationGynaekologisk obstetrisk afdeling, Amtssygehuset i Herlev.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11685857pubmed:publicationTypeEnglish Abstractlld:pubmed