Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:11142129rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11142129lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0024671lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11142129lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0015333lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11142129lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0037107lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11142129lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1979848lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11142129lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11142129lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0043309lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11142129lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0860950lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11142129lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0180392lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11142129lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0439858lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11142129lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1705938lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11142129lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1527178lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11142129pubmed:issue11lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11142129pubmed:dateCreated2001-1-4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11142129pubmed:abstractTextComparison of radiation exposure between a digital amorphous silicon and a screen-film based mammography system. Evaluation of a possible potential of full-field digital mammography in order to decrease the radiation dose.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11142129pubmed:languagegerlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11142129pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11142129pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11142129pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11142129pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11142129pubmed:monthNovlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11142129pubmed:issn1438-9029lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11142129pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GrabbeEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11142129pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HermannK PKPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11142129pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ObenauerSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11142129pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11142129pubmed:volume172lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11142129pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11142129pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11142129pubmed:pagination940-5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11142129pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11142129pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11142129...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11142129pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11142129...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11142129pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11142129...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11142129pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11142129...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11142129pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11142129...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11142129pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11142129...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11142129pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11142129...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11142129pubmed:year2000lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11142129pubmed:articleTitle[Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography].lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11142129pubmed:affiliationAbteilung Röntgendiagnostik I, Zentrum Radiologie, Klinikum der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen. kherman@gwdg.delld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11142129pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11142129pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11142129pubmed:publicationTypeEnglish Abstractlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:11142129lld:pubmed