Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:11051573rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11051573lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280500lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11051573lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034754lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11051573lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332206lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11051573lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1602245lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11051573pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11051573pubmed:dateCreated2001-2-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11051573pubmed:abstractTextThis study replicates and extends previous work showing that pictorial prompts can interfere with the learning of sight words by students with moderate mental retardation. Effects of training with 6 students were assessed during five conditions using an alternating treatments design. In four conditions, words were presented either alone or with a corresponding picture. In a fifth condition, pictures were used to provide feedback. The results showed that acquisition was achieved fastest during the word-alone conditions with 5 students.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11051573pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11051573pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11051573pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11051573pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11051573pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11051573pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11051573pubmed:issn0021-8855lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11051573pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SigafoosJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11051573pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PrinsenHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11051573pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DiddenRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11051573pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11051573pubmed:volume33lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11051573pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11051573pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11051573pubmed:pagination317-20lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11051573pubmed:dateRevised2011-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11051573pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11051573...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11051573pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11051573...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11051573pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11051573...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11051573pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11051573...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11051573pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11051573...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11051573pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11051573...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11051573pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11051573...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11051573pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11051573...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11051573pubmed:year2000lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11051573pubmed:articleTitleThe blocking effect of pictorial prompts on sight-word reading.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11051573pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Special Education, University of Nijmegen and De Lathmer, The Netherlands. R.Didden@ped.kun.nllld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11051573pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11051573pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:11051573lld:pubmed