Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:10708888rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0009452lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10708888lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0035647lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10708888lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1709627lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10708888lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0237463lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10708888lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280519lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:dateCreated2000-4-11lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:abstractTextA study conducted by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), a US public health agency, evaluated ATSDR's risk communication process, specifically the roles and responsibilities, planning, implementation, and coordination of activities in response to illegal indoor spraying of methyl parathion, a hazardous pesticide, in Pascagoula, MS. Interviews of staff members involved in the intervention were conducted and an analysis revealed strengths and areas in need of improvement in the design and implementation of risk communication strategies. Key recommendations included developing a clear strategy for planning and conducting communication activities; determining staff roles and responsibilities for coordination; and developing clear and consistent health messages, a dissemination strategy, and training in the delivery and evaluation of messages, effects, and outcomes.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:monthAprlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:issn0304-3894lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KindH PHPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CollinsC MCMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HooverM DMDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TinkerT LTLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:day3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:volume73lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:pagination117-27lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10708888...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10708888...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10708888...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10708888...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10708888...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10708888...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10708888...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10708888...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10708888...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10708888...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10708888...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10708888...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10708888...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10708888...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10708888...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10708888...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10708888...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10708888...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10708888...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10708888...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10708888...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:year2000lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:articleTitleAssessing risk communication effectiveness: perspectives of agency practitioners.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:affiliationCommunication and Research Branch, Division of Health Education and Promotion, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, NE, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. txt2@cdc.govlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10708888pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed