Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:10696428rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0370215lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10696428lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10696428lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0449943lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10696428lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0024553lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:issue2-3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:dateCreated2000-5-12lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:abstractTextWe compared the RB1B and T. King (TK) serotype 1 isolates of Marek's disease virus (MDV) in vivo. Body and organ weights, mortality, and lesions indicated that the TK inoculum established early infection more efficiently than RB1B and did greater damage to the bursa of Fabricius and thymus. Subsequent studies showed that the TK inoculum that we used contained chicken infectious anemia virus (CIAV). Therefore, pathogenicity profiles shown here should be interpreted with the presence of CIAV contamination in the TK stock in mind.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:issn0001-723Xlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KentJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PopeC RCRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RosenbergerJ...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MorganR WRWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AndersonA SASlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MilesA MAMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BernbergE LELlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:volume43lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:pagination102-5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10696428...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10696428...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10696428...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10696428...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10696428...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10696428...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10696428...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10696428...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10696428...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10696428...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:articleTitleComparison of two serotype 1 MDV isolates.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:affiliationDelaware Agricultural Experiment Station, Department of Animal and Food Sciences, College of Agricultural Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark 19717-1303, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10696428pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed