Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:10580396rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332437lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10580396lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0007226lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10580396lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0020538lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10580396lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1521970lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10580396lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0542341lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10580396lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034866lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10580396lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1515021lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10580396lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1704788lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:dateCreated1999-12-27lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:abstractTextA cross-sectional study was conducted to compare the morphological and functional characteristics of the cardiovascular system among subgroups of hypertension defined by the JNC-VI recommendations. One hundred and sixteen subjects (normotensives and unmedicated hypertensives: 49+/-10 yr) were classified into 4 groups based on the criteria of JNC-VI: normotensive (NOR: n = 38), high-normal blood pressure (HN: n = 16), stage 1 hypertensive (SI: n = 28), and stage 2 to 3 hypertensive (SII-III: n = 34). Ultrasonographic examinations of the heart and carotid artery were performed in all subjects, and the following parameters were obtained: left ventricular mass index (LVMI), relative wall thickness at end-diastole (RWTd), cardiac diastolic function (A/E), common carotid artery diameter (CAD), intimal media thickness of the common carotid artery (IMT), and distensibility of the common carotid artery (Distens). RWTd, A/E, and IMT in SI (RWTd, 0.41+/-0.07; A/E, 1.21+/-0.41; IMT, 0.69+/-0.17 mm) and SII-III patients (0.40+/-0.08, 1.38+/-0.33, 0.80+/-0.21 mm) were larger than those in NOR patients (0.33+/-0.03, 0.86+/-0.21, 0.56+/-0.10 mm) (p < .01). Furthermore, LVMI in SII-III (135.5+/-35.5 g/m2) patients was larger than that in NOR patients (99.4+/-17.5 g/m2) (p < .05). RWTd in HN patients (0.37+/-0.06) was significantly higher than that in NOR patients (p < .05). A/E tended to be larger in HN than in NOR patients (p < 0.1). In the normotensives, no significant difference in any of the parameters was detected between those with optimal (n = 19) and normal (n = 19) blood pressure. Thus, both morphological and functional changes were associated with elevation of blood pressure. Cardiac morphological adaptation and functional impairment were present even in subjects with high-normal blood pressure level, while there were no significant differences between the normal and optimal subsets.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:monthNovlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:issn0916-9636lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:authorpubmed-author:YoshidaHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NakayamaTTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KimuraYYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KuwataSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WatanabeGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DobaNNlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NishikawaEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KinouchiTTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TomiyamaHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ShiojimaKKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:volume22lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:pagination291-5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10580396...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10580396...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10580396...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10580396...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10580396...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10580396...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10580396...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10580396...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10580396...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:year1999lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:articleTitleCharacteristics of cardiovascular morphology and function in the high-normal subset of hypertension defined by JNC-VI recommendations.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:affiliationClinical Central Laboratory, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Ichihara Hospital, Chiba, Japan.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10580396pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10580396lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10580396lld:pubmed