| pubmed-article:10435930 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0023078 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0027740 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1707455 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0449851 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0205421 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:issue | 7 Pt 1 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:dateCreated | 1999-8-10 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:abstractText | Successful laryngeal transplantation will require adequate reinnervation of the larynx to allow phonation, coordinated swallowing, and respiration. A delay between laryngectomy and transplantation would be necessary in oncology patients because of the need for immunosuppression. In these patients, reinnervation of the donor organ would require "banking" and recovery of dormant recipient recurrent laryngeal nerves (RLNs). This pilot study was undertaken to compare the effectiveness of RLN storage using 1 of 2 techniques: 1) inserting the nerve into a muscle pocket or 2) anastomosing the proximal RLN stump to the ansa cervicalis. Six months following nerve transection and "banking," the proximal anterior branch of the RLN was reanastomosed to the distal anterior segment and the posterior branch was anastomosed directly to the posterior cricoarytenoid muscle. Tensionometry, image analysis, and electromyographic data were collected 1 year later. Results show reinnervation of adductors and abductors with both techniques. Banking of the RLN branches during total laryngectomy is effective and should permit delayed physiological reinnervation following laryngeal transplantation. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:citationSubset | AIM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:month | Jul | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:issn | 0003-4894 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:PetersonK LKL | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:AndrewsR JRJ | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:YeMM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:BeersR FRFJr | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:SercarzJ AJA | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:KevorkianKK | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:BlackwellK... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:volume | 108 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:pagination | 689-94 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2006-11-15 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:10435930... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:10435930... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:10435930... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:10435930... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:10435930... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:10435930... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:10435930... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:10435930... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:10435930... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:10435930... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:10435930... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:10435930... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:10435930... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:year | 1999 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:articleTitle | Comparison of nerve banking techniques in delayed laryngeal reinnervation. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:affiliation | Division of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine, USA. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:publicationType | Comparative Study | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:10435930 | pubmed:publicationType | Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. | lld:pubmed |
