Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:10087938rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10087938lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0000938lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10087938lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280500lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10087938lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0078889lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10087938pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10087938pubmed:dateCreated1999-4-7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10087938pubmed:abstractTextThis article reviews the now extensive research literature addressing the impact of accountability on a wide range of social judgments and choices. It focuses on 4 issues: (a) What impact do various accountability ground rules have on thoughts, feelings, and action? (b) Under what conditions will accountability attenuate, have no effect on, or amplify cognitive biases? (c) Does accountability alter how people think or merely what people say they think? and (d) What goals do accountable decision makers seek to achieve? In addition, this review explores the broader implications of accountability research. It highlights the utility of treating thought as a process of internalized dialogue; the importance of documenting social and institutional boundary conditions on putative cognitive biases; and the potential to craft empirical answers to such applied problems as how to structure accountability relationships in organizations.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10087938pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10087938pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10087938pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10087938pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10087938pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10087938pubmed:monthMarlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10087938pubmed:issn0033-2909lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10087938pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LernerJ SJSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10087938pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TetlockP EPElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10087938pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10087938pubmed:volume125lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10087938pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10087938pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10087938pubmed:pagination255-75lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10087938pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10087938pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10087938...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10087938pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10087938...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10087938pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10087938...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10087938pubmed:year1999lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10087938pubmed:articleTitleAccounting for the effects of accountability.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10087938pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213-3890, USA. jlerner@andrew.cmu.edulld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10087938pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10087938pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10087938pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10087938lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10087938lld:pubmed