| pubmed-article:9950985 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0011923 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0042449 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0332835 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0023216 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0184661 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1555029 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0741847 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0441633 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0175668 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0205410 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:issue | 2 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:dateCreated | 1999-3-18 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:abstractText | Duplex surveillance of lower extremity reversed vein bypass grafts (LERVG) is a means of identifying patients at risk for occlusion. The perceived accuracy of duplex scan as a means of identifying stenoses has led many surgeons to perform graft revision on the basis of duplex scan alone. This may result in missing additional lesions that are threatening patency. To assess the role of duplex scan as the sole imaging method before revision of LERVGs, we reviewed consecutive patients undergoing revisions who underwent preoperative arteriography after identification of duplex scan abnormalities. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:grant | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:month | Feb | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:issn | 0741-5214 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:PorterJ MJM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:EdwardsJ MJM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:TaylorL MLMJr | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:YeagerR ARA | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:MonetaG LGL | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:LandryG JGJ | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:McLaffertyR... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:volume | 29 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:pagination | 270-80; discussion 280-1 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2007-11-14 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:9950985-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:9950985-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:9950985-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:9950985-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:9950985-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:9950985-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:9950985-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:9950985-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:9950985-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:9950985-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:9950985-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:9950985-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:9950985-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:9950985-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:year | 1999 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:articleTitle | Duplex scanning alone is not sufficient imaging before secondary procedures after lower extremity reversed vein bypass graft. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:affiliation | Division of Vascular Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, USA. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:9950985 | pubmed:publicationType | Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. | lld:pubmed |
