Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:9931659rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9931659lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205052lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9931659lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0542341lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9931659lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0728940lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9931659lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2587213lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9931659pubmed:dateCreated1999-4-7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9931659pubmed:abstractTextPrior to sphincter-saving rectal surgery an in-depth evaluation of the patient's anorectal physiology is of paramount importance to avoid poor functional outcome. A detailed history comprising all previous operations and childbirths as well as a precise proctological examination are the most important steps in the diagnostic work-up. A standardized continence score is easy to obtain and can be used as a guideline preoperatively as well as during follow-up. Furthermore, endosonography, manometric studies and quality of life assessment can add valuable information before and after surgery. Electrophysiologic studies are generally not necessary and can therefore not be regarded as routine investigations.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9931659pubmed:languagegerlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9931659pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9931659pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9931659pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9931659pubmed:issn0942-2854lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9931659pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ThiedeAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9931659pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FreyeEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9931659pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SailerMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9931659pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FuchsK HKHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9931659pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9931659pubmed:volume115lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9931659pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9931659pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9931659pubmed:pagination459-61lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9931659pubmed:dateRevised2008-2-20lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9931659pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9931659-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9931659pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9931659-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9931659pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9931659-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9931659pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9931659-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9931659pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9931659-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9931659pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9931659-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9931659pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9931659-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9931659pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9931659-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9931659pubmed:year1998lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9931659pubmed:articleTitle[Control of function before and after sphincter-preserving rectal resection].lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9931659pubmed:affiliationChirurgische Universitätsklinik, Würzburg.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9931659pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9931659pubmed:publicationTypeEnglish Abstractlld:pubmed