Linked Life Data

9881733

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/9881733

Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:9881733rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030705lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9881733lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034372lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9881733lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205147lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9881733lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0037937lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9881733lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1552617lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9881733lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0282443lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9881733lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205099lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9881733lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0041700lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:issue12lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:dateCreated1999-3-30lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:abstractTextPatients with chronic tetraplegia are prone to develop unique clinical problems which require readmission to specialised centres where the health professionals are trained specifically to diagnose, and treat the diseases afflicting this group of patients. An appraisal of the readmission pattern of tetraplegic patients will provide the necessary data for planning allocation of beds for treatment of chronic tetraplegic patients. Hospital records of patients with tetraplegia readmitted to the Regional Spinal Injuries Centre, Southport, UK between 1 January 1994 and 31 December 1995 were analyzed to find out the number of tetraplegic patients who required readmission, reasons for readmission, duration of hospital stay, and mortality among patients readmitted. During the 2-year period, 155 tetraplegic patients were readmitted and 44 of them (28.4%) required more than one readmission (total readmission episodes: 221); these patients occupied 4.5 beds which is equivalent to 11.5% of the total bed capacity of the spinal unit. Among the reasons for the readmissions, evaluation and care of urinary tract disorders topped the list with 96 readmission episodes (43.43%) involving 70 patients; the median hospital stay was 3 days, and 18 patients (26%) required more than one readmission during this period. One hospital bed was occupied by the tetraplegic patients requiring treatment/evaluation of urinary tract disorders. Assessment and treatment of cardio-respiratory diseases was the second most common reason for readmission with 51 readmission episodes pertaining to 27 patients having a median hospital stay of 6 days; 13 patients (48%) were readmitted more than once within this 2-year period. Treatment of cardio-respiratory diseases in chronic tetraplegic patients required 1.2 hospital beds yearly. Only five tetraplegic patients were readmitted for treatment of pressure sore(s); however they had a prolonged hospital stay (median duration: 101 days). Social reasons accounted for 13 readmission episodes concerning nine patients who stayed in the hospital for varying periods (median: 6.5 days; mean: 35 days). Four tetraplegic patients readmitted with acute chest infection expired. An 81 year-old tetraplegic died of myocardial infarction. Urinary sepsis, renal insufficiency, respiratory failure and intra-cerebral haemorrhage accounted for the demise of a 41 year-old tetraplegic patient following surgical removal of a large, impacted stone at the pelviureteric junction. A tetraplegic patient who was admitted with haematuria subsequently underwent cystectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder; he developed secondaries and expired 5 months later. As more patients with high cervical spinal cord injury survive the initial period of trauma, and as the life expectancy of tetraplegic patients increases, it is likely that greater numbers of tetraplegic patients will be requiring readmission to spinal injuries centre. Although it may be possible to prevent some of the complications of spinal cord injury and hence the need for a readmission, progress in medicine and rehabilitation technology will create additional demands for readmissions of chronic tetraplegic patients in order to implement the newer therapeutic strategies. Thus a change in the pattern of readmission of chronic tetraplegic patients is likely to be the future trend and this should be taken into account while making plans for providing the optimum care to chronic tetraplegic patients.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:issn1362-4393lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SinghGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BingleyJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SoniB MBMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KrishnanK RKRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:authorpubmed-author:VaidyanathanS...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WattJ WJWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ROER JRJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MansourPPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SethDDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GopalanLLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:volume36lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:pagination838-46lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:dateRevised2011-6-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9881733-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9881733-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9881733-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9881733-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9881733-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9881733-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9881733-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9881733-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9881733-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9881733-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9881733-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9881733-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9881733-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9881733-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9881733-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9881733-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:year1998lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:articleTitleA review of the readmissions of patients with tetraplegia to the Regional Spinal Injuries Centre, Southport, United Kingdom, between January 1994 and December 1995.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:affiliationRegional Spinal Injuries Centre, District General Hospital, Southport, Merseyside, UK.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9881733pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed